SemiMedia SemiMedia
  • Breaking News
  • MarketWatch
  • Distribution
  • Manufacturer
  • Video
  • About us
Home › MarketWatch › Following Samsung, Micron became the second company to be inquired by the Chinese anti-trust agency
  • 0

Following Samsung, Micron became the second company to be inquired by the Chinese anti-trust agency

SemiMediaEdit
May 25, 2018

After Samsung was investigated by the National Development and Reform Commission of China at the end of last year, the Chinese anti-trust agency recently interviewed the world's third largest memory chip producer, Micron. The survey may involve DRAM price hikes and abuse of market dominance last year to suppress Chinese companies.

In the past two years, as DRAM prices have remained high, the revenue of upstream manufacturers has increased dramatically. In addition to Samsung’s revenue and innovation record, Micron’s financial report for the second quarter of 2018, announced on the 22nd, also surpassed the best record in history. The financial report shows that Micron’s revenue in the second quarter of 2018 reached US$7.35 billion, an increase of 58% year-on-year.

While the storage industry is being dominated by Samsung, Hynix, and Micron, the industry is increasingly questioning the three major manufacturers for reaching a tacit understanding and manipulating market prices.

Last month, Samsung, Hynix, and Micron faced litigation in the United States. The three companies were accused of colluding between 2016 and 2017 to limit the supply of various DRAM products on the market, artificially driving up DRAM prices. According to the data, as of mid-2017, Samsung, Hynix, and Micron all accounted for 96% of the global DRAM chip market share. In the period of lawsuit charges, the price of DRAM rose by 130%.

According to the provisions of China's anti-monopoly law, the market share accounts for more than 50%, which can be presumed to have a dominant market position. Whether or not it is suspected of monopoly can not rely solely on market share as the basis for determination, but on the basis of whether or not the implementation of antimonopoly law provides specific monopoly behavior. If the investigation proves that the three major manufacturers jointly increase prices, it constitutes a monopoly behavior which prohibited by China’s anti-monopoly law.

Related

MICRON
Element14 announces increased investment in inventory and linecard
Previous
8-inch wafer production capacity continues to be full, prices may rise
Next

All Comments (0)

Back
No Comment.

Top Post

Fire broke out at AKM factory in Japan
Qualcomm ranked first in the world's top ten IC design companies
Mouser Electronics expands to the Philippines with local customer service center
Analyze the key factors and prospects of electronic components shortage from the perspective of wafer industry
What is the root cause of the decline of the Japanese semiconductor industry?
ST releases price increase notice

Subscribe SemiMedia

Please check your E-mail to confirm the subscribtion.

Related posts

Micron to phase out DDR4 as DRAM prices spike amid supply shift

Micron to phase out DDR4 as DRAM prices spike amid supply shift

June 16, 2025
0
Micron raises U.S. investment to $200 billion, boosts HBM and manufacturing plans

Micron raises U.S. investment to $200 billion, boosts HBM and manufacturing plans

June 13, 2025
0
Micron to build semiconductor SEZ in India under $1.6 billion investment plan

Micron to build semiconductor SEZ in India under $1.6 billion investment plan

June 12, 2025
0
Wolfspeed trims 73 jobs in North Carolina amid weak SiC chip demand

Wolfspeed trims 73 jobs in North Carolina amid weak SiC chip demand

June 12, 2025
0
1
Copyright © 2017-2025 SemiMedia. Designed by nicetheme.
  • Please set up your first menu at [Admin -> Appearance -> Menus]
  • electronic components news
  • Electronic components supplier
  • Electronic parts supplier
  • Infineon
  • Electronic component news
  • Renesas
  • Vishay
  • STMicroelectronics
  • NXP
  • TDK

SemiMediaEdit

Administrator